Mark Galbreath wrote:
>
> I might add that conceptually, .NET has the potential to be a better
> programming environment than pure Java because your development teams can
> use whatever programming language they want, be it Perl, Python, C, C++,
> Visual Basic, ASP, Smalltalk, Java, or even COBOL - as long as the
> interpreter can compile the chosen language to the .NET bytecode (the
> so-called CLR, or Common Language Runtime), it doesn't matter what
> programming language is used.
Out of interest, which of the above mentioned languages do already
support .NET ?
Bye, Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Kless
INA Waelzlager Schaeffler oHG, Industriestrasse 1-3
91074 Herzogenaurach, Germany
Tel.: +49 9132 82 4730 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff SERVLET-INTEREST".
Archives: http://archives.java.sun.com/archives/servlet-interest.html
Resources: http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/external-resources.html
LISTSERV Help: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/user/user.html
