I'm pretty sure they don't have that large a
bandwidth, I'd
think more in the line of a 30Megabit (note, not Byte)
connection would be more realistic. Over a 24 hour
period
a 30 megabit connection would allow just over 925
thousand
WU download per day at 100% efficiency.
Bill
(Bandwidth X Seconds X hours)
30,000,000 X 3600 x 24 = 2,592,000,000,000 bits per
day
/ 8 = 324,000,000,000
Bytes per day
/ 350,000
925,714 WUs Per day
At 05:44 PM 3/1/01 -0500, you wrote:
S@H has a 30 gigabyte bandwidth.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Mar 1, 6:58pm, "chrisrutt" wrote:
} Subject: Overloads and Digests Quotes
}
} . . .
- - - - -
Pardon me while I think (compute) out loud for a
moment.
There's about 86,400 seconds in a day. A 1Mbit/sec
link
(approximately a T1) can average 100Kbytes/sec
(protocol,
acks, etc...) That's about 8.6Gbytes/day.
A WU takes about 340K to download. So the above link
could handle about 25,000 WUs per day. 1.5 million
WUs
would take about 2 months.
A typical 10Mbit network could cut that down to a
week.
A fast 100Mbit network could cut that down to 14
hours.
Like I said, the first to get their WUs will likely be
coming back for "seconds" before everyone has been
fed.
Anyone remember how fast the S@h link to the outside
world is? (I'm not talking about the cut fiber, but
the
ultimate link to the internet).
Of course, 20 WUs a piece would scale those numbers up
accordingly.
==
Unsubscribe instructions:
http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html
This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space
communities online.
Mailing list services provided by klx.communications
-- www.klx.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
==
Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html
This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online.
Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com