It WAS 30 Mb and that was their limit. And the max amount is about
double the rate they get back. Assume they get stuff working wee hours
Saturday A.M., factor in people going for stats, etc, and it looks like
1 day completely firewalled (Saturday), some hints of normalcy on
Sunday, but still slow, and approaching decent on Monday. Normal on
Tuesday.
I can make it to Monday. Won't even bother to turn on connect until
then. Will have 150+ results to turn in. I wound up with extra work
units because I made a mistake beta-testing the new SetiQueue, and wound
up last week with both the old and new queues full. I double clicked the
wrong icon and the old SetiQueue (which I had run down to empty) fired
up and filled up again.
Turns out that was quite the fortunate little goof. When the new
SetiQueue used up its own cache, I proxied it to the old SetiQueue, and
now it's cleaning out that cache, without missing any beta-testing time.
-----------------
Guy Olinger
Apex, NC, USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 6:21 PM
Subject: Bandwidth
>
> I'm pretty sure they don't have that large a
> bandwidth, I'd
> think more in the line of a 30Megabit (note, not Byte)
> connection would be more realistic. Over a 24 hour
> period
> a 30 megabit connection would allow just over 925
> thousand
> WU download per day at 100% efficiency.
>
> Bill
>
> (Bandwidth X Seconds X hours)
>
> 30,000,000 X 3600 x 24 = 2,592,000,000,000 bits per
> day
> / 8 = 324,000,000,000
> Bytes per day
> / 350,000
> 925,714 WUs Per day
>
> At 05:44 PM 3/1/01 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
> S@H has a 30 gigabyte bandwidth.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> On Mar 1, 6:58pm, "chrisrutt" wrote:
> } Subject: Overloads and Digests Quotes
> }
> } . . .
>
> - - - - -
>
> Pardon me while I think (compute) out loud for a
> moment.
>
> There's about 86,400 seconds in a day. A 1Mbit/sec
> link
> (approximately a T1) can average 100Kbytes/sec
> (protocol,
> acks, etc...) That's about 8.6Gbytes/day.
>
> A WU takes about 340K to download. So the above link
> could handle about 25,000 WUs per day. 1.5 million
> WUs
> would take about 2 months.
>
> A typical 10Mbit network could cut that down to a
> week.
> A fast 100Mbit network could cut that down to 14
> hours.
> Like I said, the first to get their WUs will likely be
> coming back for "seconds" before everyone has been
> fed.
>
> Anyone remember how fast the S@h link to the outside
> world is? (I'm not talking about the cut fiber, but
> the
> ultimate link to the internet).
>
> Of course, 20 WUs a piece would scale those numbers up
> accordingly.
>
> ==
> Unsubscribe instructions:
> http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html
> This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space
> communities online.
> Mailing list services provided by klx.communications
> -- www.klx.com
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/
> ==
> Unsubscribe instructions:
http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html
> This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities
online.
> Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com
>
>
==
Unsubscribe instructions: http://www.talkspace.net/mlists/setiathome.html
This list sponsored by talkspace.net: building space communities online.
Mailing list services provided by klx.communications -- www.klx.com
