Hi,
Yes, every SF should have different IP, but its port is restricted to
the "dst_port" of its attached SFF. If that port on the SF VM has
already been used by another application, the SF listening port must be
changed, then does the SFF dst_port and other SFs attached to the same SFF.
Regards,
Victor
On 11/8/16 3:33 PM, Yang, Yi Y wrote:
Why is it inconvenient? Every SF should have different IP.
*From:*VictorVu [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 8, 2016 2:21 PM
*To:* Yang, Yi Y <[email protected]>; Brady Johnson
<[email protected]>
*Cc:* sfc-dev opendaylight <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [sfc-dev] SF dataplane set port bug
Yang,
I see, so this is an OVS limitation. Does it mean all SFs attached to
an SFF have to listen to a same port? It seems inconvenient.
Thank you.
On 11/8/16 9:21 AM, Yang, Yi Y wrote:
Victor, thank you for your test, when OVS sends a VxLAN packet, it
doesn’t know destination UDP port, nobody will tell OVS, so it
only can use dst_port in vxlan port options, your test also
confirmed this.
*From:*VictorVu [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 8, 2016 5:46 AM
*To:* Yang, Yi Y <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>; Brady Johnson
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Cc:* sfc-dev opendaylight <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [sfc-dev] SF dataplane set port bug
Hi Yang,
I don't think the problem is within the SF/sfc-agent, because as
you can see in the pcap file, the SFF always sends to SF's 6633
port, no matter which port the SF is listening to. I tried to
change all 6633 ports in the configuration file to 6666 and it
worked, but if I only change SF's configuration it didn't.
Regards,
On 11/7/16 11:25 AM, Yang, Yi Y wrote:
Hi, Victor
Try this one patch.
*From:*[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
*VictorVu
*Sent:* Sunday, November 6, 2016 12:38 PM
*To:* Brady Johnson <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Cc:* sfc-dev opendaylight <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [sfc-dev] SF dataplane set port bug
Hi,
Sorry for the delayed response. I reproduced the sfc103 demo
for testing. This is the config file:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/43016963/ODL%20shared%20config/setup_sfc.py
The dumpflow of sff1:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/43016963/ODL%20shared%20config/sff1%20dumpflow.txt
sudo ovs-vsctl show
06321d10-c7b5-47ea-8b5f-48c034a843cb
Manager "tcp:192.168.1.5:6640"
is_connected: true
Bridge br-sfc
Controller "tcp:192.168.1.5:6653"
is_connected: true
Port br-sfc
Interface br-sfc
type: internal
Port "sff1-dpl"
Interface "sff1-dpl"
type: vxlan
options: {dst_port="6633", exts=gpe, key=flow,
"nshc1"=flow, "nshc2"=flow, "nshc3"=flow, "nshc4"=flow,
nsi=flow, nsp=flow, remote_ip=flow}
ovs_version: "2.5.90"
I'm not quite understand the meaning of the above option
"dst_port".
And this is the packet capturing results:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/43016963/ODL%20shared%20config/mycap.pcap
Thank you very much,
Victor
On 11/6/16 3:05 AM, Brady Johnson wrote:
Victor,
Could you also send us the sff configuration, a dump of
the flows, and the result of the following command:
sudo ovs-vsctl show
Thanks,
Brady
On Nov 5, 2016 18:48, "VictorVu" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Brady,
I have just tried the master branch (commit
f65065b19516a750b73262c63ba269fca2365e23), still the
same problem. The configuration is like this:
"service-function": [
{
"ip-mgmt-address": "170.10.0.5",
"name": "dpi-1",
"nsh-aware": "true",
"rest-uri": "http://170.10.0.5:5000";
<http://170.10.0.5:5000>,
"sf-data-plane-locator": [
{
"ip": "170.10.0.5",
"name": "dpi-1-dpl",
"port": 6666,
"service-function-forwarder": "SFF1",
"transport":
"service-locator:vxlan-gpe"
}
],
"type": "dpi"
},
Thank you,
Victor
On 11/6/16 2:32 AM, Brady Johnson wrote:
Victor,
What version of odl are you using?
Thanks,
Brady
On Nov 5, 2016 18:15, "VictorVu"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Hi.
Recently I have tried to set SF dataplane
locator port to other values than 6633 and it
did not work. SFFs still send packet to port
6633 of the SF ip address. Has anyone
encountered this problem? Is it a bug in
current version?
Best regards.
Victor
_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
