For ovs, it is enough, you need to change Vagrantfile. From: Miguel Angel M. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 5:51 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [sfc-dev] NSH Proxy with SFC103?
Thanks Yi for your prompt answer. I will try to run this in a laptop with 16GB RAM only. Since OVS requires much less memory than VPP, Do you think 2 GB per VM (instead of 4GB) is reasonable? Best Regards, Miguel Ángel. On 12/05/17 03:06, Yang, Yi Y wrote: sfc104 also can support NSH proxy by using ovs or ovs DPDK. $ ./run_demo.sh --nshproxy ovs or $ ./run_demo.sh --nshproxy ovs_dpdk From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of M Angel Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 4:55 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [sfc-dev] NSH Proxy with SFC103? Hi everyone! I am trying to have a very basic demo of SFC with a real firewall not supporting NSH, thus NSH proxy is required. I wanted to use SFC103 as a start but I am afraid it is not possible due to lack of NSH Proxy support. I guess one option is to use SFC104 with VPP but I wonder if it is possible to use SFC103 instead (OVS) with [0] as pointed by Danny Zhou in [1]? Thank you! Miguel Ángel. [0] https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/34730/ [1] https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/sfc-dev/2016-May/002961.html
_______________________________________________ sfc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
