Hi,

I try to add FaaS into the karaf4 distribution , but sfc feature which faas has 
dependency on hasn't been added yet. Actually I found out not many features in 
the karaf4 either. Seems most of projects  is still in the process to add their 
features in karaf 4.

Thanks
Xingjun

From: Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) 
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 11:30 AM
To: Xingjun Chu <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: Migrate to odlparent 2.0.0

Hi,

We need to get rid of karaf 3 completely. When the migration to karaf 4 is 
finished the karaf 3 is removed. So just remove your karaf 3 distribution 
completely and use just karaf 4 distribution (update your local karaf 3 to 
karaf 4, test the build. If that works you can prepare a patch for 
integration/distribution to include your project also in distribution ODL). 
Take a look at this guide: 
https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/Karaf_4_migration#Step_8:_add_your_karaf_4_features_to_distribution

Michal

From: Xingjun Chu [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 5:04 PM
To: Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Migrate to odlparent 2.0.0

Hi,

I was in the process bumping the version odlparent-lite to 2.0.2. I found 
features-sfc is not available in sfc feature's pom file, only features4-sfc 
left.  In FaaS' karaf3 features, faas feature still refer to features-sfc, but 
if I replace it with features4-sfc, I got some testing error saying single 
feature test fail.

So what's the plan right now regarding karaf 3 and 4, do we need to get rid of 
karaf 3 or needs to keep both?  How do I fix this.  Any pointer is appreciated.

Thanks & Regards
Xingjun

From: Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) 
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 3:49 AM
To: Xingjun Chu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Migrate to odlparent 2.0.0

Hi,

Actually there are two thinks that needs to be changed one is migration to new 
guava. I have seen a patch for FaaS project created by Robert but it is not 
finished yet. https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/50190/7
And the second change is to migrate to odl-parent 2.0.0. I don't know if there 
is a guide for this but there are a lot of patches that you can take a look at. 
It`s just a version bump and replacing old karaf 3 features with karaf 4 ones. 
Just take a look at the patches in the odl-parent 2.0.0 topic: 
https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/q/topic:odlparent200

Michal

From: Xingjun Chu [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 7:19 PM
To: Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Migrate to odlparent 2.0.0

Is there a guide about hot to migrate?

Thanks
Xingjun

From: Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) 
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 12:05 PM
To: Xingjun Chu <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Migrate to odlparent 2.0.0

Hi,

Groupbased policy has a dependency on Faas project. We want to migrate to 
ODL-parent 2.0.0, but Faas project didn't  migrate to new odl parent yet. Can 
you provide us with updates regarding your project and odl-parent migration. 
Until your project is migrated we will be blocked.

Thanks

Michal
_______________________________________________
sfc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opendaylight.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc-dev
  • Re: [sfc-dev... Xingjun Chu
    • Re: [sf... Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
      • Re:... Xingjun Chu
        • ... Brady Johnson
          • ... Xingjun Chu
          • ... Jaime Caamaño Ruiz
            • ... Brady Johnson
            • ... Xingjun Chu
              • ... Brady Johnson
                • ... Jaime Caamaño Ruiz

Reply via email to