I agree with you Mark, at least having the possibility to have a completely desktop independant sflphone would be great.
On 05/04/2011 05:19 PM, Mark Dammer wrote: > This is some food for thought because I notice that questions related to > the KDE client and problems with the dependency on Evolution are > regularly coming up: > Has it ever been considered to make sflphone completely desktop > independant ? > A client that uses QT, GTK or any other GUI library but that has no > dependencies to any specific desktop environments software (Evolution / > Kaddressbook). This would open up sflphone to many other desktops (XFCE > etc.). > I just found this poll on the web: > http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/11/what-mail-client-do-you-use-it-poll/ > Currently Thunderbird clearly leads with 2423 votes / 33.37% before > Evolution (1545 votes / 21.28%). Kmail gets only 1.69% of the votes. > Looking at this I have doubts about how many Gnome or KDE users are > actually using their desktops addressbook. I myself use KDE but I am one > of the 33% who use Thunderbird and I use TBs addressbook. > > thanks for all the work on SFLphone, > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > SFLphone mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.savoirfairelinux.net/mailman/listinfo/sflphone _______________________________________________ SFLphone mailing list [email protected] http://lists.savoirfairelinux.net/mailman/listinfo/sflphone
