Thanks, Barry! That's a very useful rationale. I'll relay that! On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 15:09, Barry Revzin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:45 AM Thomas Köppe via Core < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello Core! >> >> I was contacted regarding P0614R1 >> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0614r1.html>, >> which adds an optional initializer to the range-based "for" loop. The >> proposal did not add any feature test macros. The person suggested >> updating __cpp_range_based_for to a more recent value (suggested "2017L"). >> >> Do you think we should do that? Is it even editorial? >> >> Thank you! >> >> Thomas >> > > CCing SG10. > See Richard's response here: > https://lists.isocpp.org/sg10/2020/03/0708.php. > > Barry >
-- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
