So useful that it should probably appear in SD-6 SD-FeatureTest! If only I knew the guy who was maintaining it...
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:12 AM Thomas Köppe <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Barry! That's a very useful rationale. I'll relay that! > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 15:09, Barry Revzin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:45 AM Thomas Köppe via Core < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello Core! >>> >>> I was contacted regarding P0614R1 >>> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0614r1.html>, >>> which adds an optional initializer to the range-based "for" loop. The >>> proposal did not add any feature test macros. The person suggested >>> updating __cpp_range_based_for to a more recent value (suggested "2017L"). >>> >>> Do you think we should do that? Is it even editorial? >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> Thomas >>> >> >> CCing SG10. >> See Richard's response here: >> https://lists.isocpp.org/sg10/2020/03/0708.php. >> >> Barry >> >
-- SG10 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg10
