----- Original Message ----- 
From: Bob Taft 
To: mary rose 
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2008 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: "The Revolution Devours Its Children - BE RESPONSIBLE - OR ELSE


There seem to be endless solutions offered to reverse the devastating slide of 
society into oblivion - again - yet all miss the basic problem, 
IRRESPONSIBILITY GRANTED AND/OR IMPOSED BY GOVERNMENT.

Everyone loves the liberty/equality talk but everyone also has the idea that 
their survival depends on getting a notch up on their neighbors.  They really 
don't want Equality, they want the Liberty to hopefully advance beyond their 
neighbors.  Actually nothing wrong with that.  Dissatisfaction with one's lot 
in life is the prime mover of civilization.

The difficulty comes when Government - which represents the collective 
Irresponsibility of the people - is used to grant special Irresponsibilities to 
particular segments of society.  The Irresponsibility that has most of us in a 
bind today is that which creates CORPORATIONS, which of themselves are not 
evil, but when given certain dispensations by Government they begin doing evil 
things.  The worst Irresponsibility granted to Corporations is the concept of 
Limited Liability which allows the owners of corporations to rake in the 
profits, but makes them immune to any action that might attempt to make them 
pay for their losses.  They can do acts through their corporate structure for 
which an individual might land in jail, but corporate law makes them immune.  
This is what is behind the Wall Street criminality going on in recent weeks, 
and the Responsibility for it all is being billed to YOU AND ME.

I see nothing less feudal for land management under the Geonomy plan than under 
the current feudal system.  There is no actual land ownership today.  We are 
but tenants on the King's lands.  Land titles "In Allodium" do grant ownership 
but are almost extinct today.  We are tenants and if we cease paying rent we 
are evicted.

The Geonomy system would attempt to balance this off by giving part of the rent 
back, as would other similar systems do, yet the real problem is allowing the 
King to steal us blind in the first place.  

A legitimate government (preferably based upon the old system of Exodus 18:21) 
would have neither need nor ability to pick our pockets.  The US government, 
fatally flawed as it is, based upon the 1787 Con-Job, existed quite well 
financially on duties, imposts and excises for nearly 115 years until 
encumbered with a foreign-owned banking corporation which has brought the US to 
bankruptcy.

There is nothing good about granted Irresponsibilities, whether granted to 
mega-corporations, or to masses of individuals.  There is in the long run no 
escaping Self-Responsibility.   One has to get over the only-live-once 
silliness.  There is a very basic agreed-upon LAW that is behind the civilizing 
structure of every society: THE GOLDEN RULE.  I like "'an it harm none, do what 
thou wilt."  The one most familiar to us all is "Do unto others as you would 
have them do unto you."  That's really a bit too toned down.  Better might be 
"You WILL get back just what you put out."  Or if you prefer, "As ye sow so 
shall ye reap."  The Golden Rule has dozens of forms as it is so very obviously 
in effect at all times and so obviously understandable by all societies.

So it would behoove us all to remember that a Responsibility escaped today WILL 
come back to haunt us some day in the future, whether in this life or a 
succeeding one.  That's the Golden Rule.  It even applies to Wall Street 
criminals.  You can be sure that there is a special Hell awaiting the likes of 
Fed chairmen and Treasury secretaries, and CEOs of any capitalist club that 
attempts to live high off the labors of others by fraud.


Best regards,.
Bob Taft
The Taft Ranch
Upton, Wyoming 
(307) 465-2206
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=74897
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint
the great ones to public office." Aesop 



From: mary rose 
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2008 5:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; Discussion Forum for Global Justice 
Subject: Fw: "The Revolution Devours Its Children



This is a good overview of the situation today and what we are faced with, 
however, what I found to 
be more important is the link at the bottom of the page to  
http://www.progress.org/geonomy/
The Geonomy Society dwelves into land ownership and the question as to who the 
Earth belongs
and its apportionment. 

As a real estate broker for many years and having gone through a major 
recession, and having lost
everything myself in that recession, i began to question the commodification of 
land.  Before we 
became an industrial society land was held for generations as productive farm 
land which supported
many.  But, with industrialization and corporatization, people became 
increasingly mobile and 
large land holdings began to be sold off for "housing tracts" in which people 
lived while going off 
to work every day dependent upon an outside "job" for income.  And, at the same 
time technological
advances were changing industry and excluding many from the laborforce, the 
same was happening
as agriculture became technofied as well. Now run by machinery instead of human 
labor we see 
huge tracts of land under corporate ownership producing immense quantities of 
food without the
use of but minimal human labor.  

In addition, real estate speculators have continually begun to hold large 
tracts of land off of the 
market in order to take advantage of property appreciation.  A practice which 
deprives many
of land use from which to practice subsistence farming thus forcing them into 
migration since 
there are not enough jobs to provide income for those who have been displaced 
by mechanization.

In addition, as homeowners have become more mobil holding a place of residence 
for only 
2 - 4 years before moving on due to "corporate transfers," speculation in this 
segment has 
increased as well. And, in today's market much of the reason for ownership is 
simply 
"to make money".  It is no longer valued for its productivity as our life 
support system -- or
as a place in which to live and raise one's family, something that should be 
held sacred and 
revered -- but is increasingly monetized simply for bottom line profit. 

And this is something that has to change if we are to not only survive but 
thrive as the human
family.

mary rose 

We must be the change we wish to see in our lives.   M Gandhi 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jeffery J. Smith 
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: "The Revolution Devours Its Children


What $700B won't buy: a quick fix for the economy
Saturday September 27, 2:45 pm ET 
By Michael Liedtke, AP Business Writer


     

What the US government can't buy for $700 billion: a quick fix for the 
broken-down economy




SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Not even $700 billion will be enough to spare the United 
States from more economic anguish if the government's proposed banking bailout 
pans out like similar desperation moves during the past two decades.
            ADVERTISEMENT 
     

It usually takes years to recover from a financial crisis severe enough for 
politicians to ride to the rescue with truckloads of taxpayer money.

Take, for example, the U.S. government's August 1989 bailout of the 
savings-and-loan industry. The stock market fell by 12 percent within the first 
14 months of the rescue plan while the economy slipped into an eight-month 
recession that began in July 1990. Housing prices that had just begun to erode 
continued to fall for another three years.

There's little reason to believe it will be dramatically different this time 
around, particularly since this bailout involves harder-to-value assets and 
comes with the U.S. economy already on the edge of a recession, if one hasn't 
begun already.

"This is going to take years to work out and it will be incredibly 
complicated," predicted banking consultant Bert Ely, who has extensively 
studied the U.S. government's 1989 bailout.

Although lawmakers are still sparring over the precise details, the proposed 
bailout would authorize the government to borrow up to $700 billion to buy the 
toxic assets poisoning banks. Most of these holdings are tied to mortgages made 
to borrowers who either can't afford to make their monthly payments or have 
simply chosen to default because they owe far more than their homes are worth. 
No one seems quite certain how much these assets are worth, but the government 
is betting that -- with time -- it can get a handle on it and eventually profit.

Even as the government tries to clean up the mess left by reckless home 
lenders, borrowers and investors, more problems are likely to stack up.

The trouble could include longer unemployment lines as struggling companies 
faced with declining sales and limited access to credit trim their payrolls. 
That could lead to even more bank failures as cash-strapped borrowers don't 
repay loans. And most experts think there's still a good chance the downturn in 
the housing and stock markets will deepen to further spook already frightened 
consumers.

The government is hoping its intervention will unclog the lending pipeline, but 
that isn't a certainty either, said Sung Won Sohn, an economics professor at 
California State University, Channel Islands.

"If I am a medium-sized bank on Main Street, simply because the government is 
bringing a bailout package to Wall Street doesn't mean I am suddenly going to 
change my mind and start lending money again," Sohn said.

That suggests the economic statistics won't even capture some of the collateral 
damage -- all the lost lending opportunities that occur as banks try to bolster 
their rickety balance sheets. Many banks have curtailed their lending because 
they are already swimming in losses and don't want to risk drowning by taking 
chances on more borrowers.

"The real tragedy is we will never know how many businesses would have been 
started or how many businesses might have expanded if all this hadn't 
happened," said Jonathan Macey, deputy dean of Yale Law School, who wrote a 
book about a government bailout in Sweden during the early 1990s.

In a best case scenario, Macey said the United States will bounce back within 
two years, like Sweden did after the government spent billions of dollars to 
salvage the country's troubled banks and prop up a slumping housing market.

Before the medicine took effect, Sweden suffered through a 20-month recession 
that saw nearly 60,000 companies go bankrupt, housing prices fall by 19 percent 
and the country's bellwether stock market index plunge 45 percent from its 
peak. Once the hangover ended, the good times resumed; Sweden's economic growth 
has averaged 3.2 percent since 1994.

Sweden spent 65 billion kronor (about $10 billion at the time), but made most 
of the money back because it bought a stake in some of the troubled banks. The 
government still owns nearly 20 percent in one bank -- a stake that is now up 
for sale. U.S. lawmakers also have been debating whether it makes sense to 
acquire stock in some of the banks that the government intends to help out.

In a more sobering situation, the payoff from the U.S. bailout might take much 
longer. That's what happened in Japan after its government finally intervened 
in a real estate and banking crisis that began in the early 1990s.

By the time the government acted in 1997, the economic hole was so deep that it 
took another seven or eight years to climb out. The net public outlay to clean 
up mess was 18 trillion yen ($168 billion), according to the Financial Services 
Agency.

The abysmal times in Japan during the 1990s are now known as the "lost decade." 
Even though the economy is better now, the Japan's stock market still hasn't 
returned to its peak before the bubble burst. And Japan still has about $9 
billion worth of property held as collateral that needs to be sold.

It seems unlikely that the United States will have to wait as long for a 
recovery because the government is wading into the financial muck much more 
quickly than Japan did.

In contrast, the United States is promising to bail out its banks 18 months 
after mortgage lender New Century Financial Corp. filed for bankruptcy -- a 
move that set off alarms about the rot ruining home loan portfolios.

"Some resolution measures are more effective than others in restoring the 
banking system to health and containing the fallout on the real economy," the 
International Monetary Fund concluded in a study of 124 financial crises since 
1970. "Above all, speed appears to be of the essence."

Even if the U.S. government is moving in time to make a difference, success is 
likely to hinge on the ability to figure out the right price to pay for an 
exotic mix of mortgage-backed investments and other serpentine securities that 
aren't easily appraised. And then the government must hope the housing market 
eventually rebounds to lift the value of the acquired assets.

If those pieces fall into place, the United States could profit or at least 
minimize its losses. On the flip side, the losses could be huge if the 
government misjudges the value of the problem assets or the housing market 
remains in a funk.

"The best we can hope for is that this (bailout) buys us time," said Edward 
Yardeni, who runs his own economic research firm.

The United States moved a little quicker to address the mortgage crisis than it 
did in the savings-and-loan debacle of the 1980s. Although warning signs of an 
industry breakdown started to flash in the mid-1980s, the government waited 
until August 1989 to create the Resolution Trust Corp. to dispose of the 
repossessed homes, offices, cars, planes and even artwork held by failed S&Ls.

During the next six years, the RTC sold nearly $400 billion in assets on the 
books of more than 700 failed thrifts. Taxpayers ended up sustaining a loss of 
$125 billion to $150 billion on the fire sale -- about 2 percent of the 
country's gross domestic product by the time the bailout was completed in 1995. 
Entering the S&L bailout, the government had projected a taxpayer loss of $40 
billion to $50 billion.

If the ratio of losses to assets inherited in the latest $700 billion bailout 
is similar to what occurred in the S&L crisis, the taxpayers will be saddled 
with a bill of more than $250 billion, which also translates into about 2 
percent of the nation's current GDP.

Data from the IMF's study suggest the losses could run even higher. The 
monetary fund calculated governments typically recover about 18 cents on every 
dollar spent in bailouts -- a rate that would translate into a loss of more 
than $500 billion. The United States seems unlikely to sustain a loss that 
large since it presumably will be buying the banking assets at a sharp discount 
-- leaving plenty of room for an upside.

Although the S&L bailout was the biggest in U.S. history before this one, the 
challenges facing the government are radically different.

In 1989-95, the government and an army of contractors disposed of assets that 
were dumped into their laps as S&Ls collapsed. And it wasn't too difficult to 
figure what those assets were worth because their value could be easily 
measured against similar property. That's not the case this time. Part of the 
reason so many banks are imperiled is that no one is sure what their 
investments are worth.

Most economists agree absorbing the bailout's costs are preferable to running 
the risk of the entire U.S. financial system unraveling -- a calamity that 
would probably trigger a global depression. But knowing things could be even 
worse probably won't make it easier to stomach the turmoil still to come.

"Unwinding asset and credit bubbles is a long and arduous task even with 
aggressive government involvement," Merrill Lynch economist David Rosenberg 
wrote in a report titled "Capitalism takes a sabbatical."

AP Business Writer Yuri Kageyama in Tokyo and Associated Press Writer Louise 
Nordstrom in Stockholm contributed to this story.

SMITH, Jeffery J.
President, Forum on Geonomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; www.geonomics.org
Share Earth's worth to prosper and conserve.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ShadowGovernment" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/ShadowGovernment
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to