I like the X11 license. It says you can do anything you want as long as you
don't remove the copyrightsd from the code.
This really helped Mono get off the ground, many contributors would not have
joined had it used a more restrictive license.
We do want people to use our code, right?
Also with a dual liceses, who get the money? Who negoeates the contracts?
Dual licenses only make sense for a project "owned by a company.
HP and Intel would only contribute code to Mono after we switched the
libraries to X11.
Mono shares a ton of code with Mainsoft that would not have been possible
with a stricter licesens.
Dennis
---------------------------------
Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. -------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
SharpOS-Developers mailing list
SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
