> It's below everything: Aah. William - can I request you to trim and quote a little bit to make it easier on us older farts? :) You don't need to be as anal about trimming as me.. but a little please. :)
> Since the provisional decision-making board of SharpOS is still being > formed, the decision for this issue should be delayed by two weeks. I agree fully that any decision on it should wait until the board is properly formed. I think any possible discussion though could proceed until then. > This will allow for potential developers to apply to be on the > provisional decision-making board, and then have time to discuss the > issue before a final vote is called. Full agreement. > I'm not trying to kill the conversation. In fact, I'm suggesting that > we have a set time-frame to decide on this, in a way that satisfies > most contributors. Feel free to continue the discussion, because even > if you don't want to apply to have a vote, at least your opinions can > be considered by the decision-making body when the time comes. > > This issue alone should encourage people to have themselves listed as a > decision-making body member. As long as people see the issue is on the table and will be acted on in a reasonable time, I think that will satisfy all concerned. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ SharpOS-Developers mailing list SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
