Hmm, I thought the current kernel was a POC. I don't mean the 'final
version' but I do mean the 'final implementation', that is, what we will
carry on working with from here on out.
Again, can I get write access to the sandbox PLZ...
Jonathan Chayce Dickinson
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce
Markham
Sent: 16 November 2007 08:48 AM
To: sharpos-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SharpOS Developers] JIT what we need to do...
[Jonathan Dickinson]
Guys, documentation!!! Let's look at it from the most fundamental aspect,
which we have been doing until now: and it works. We have a booting kernel.
But I rate we create an empty branch so that we can start working on the
final Kernel: I really think we (or rather you guys) know enough at this
point to get it right.
Jonathan Dickinson
Heh, you said "final". You should know: this is open-source, and the f-word
is forbidden!
But actually, the kernel is in a decent state. Some of it needs expansion.
Some of it needs some small refactoring.
But the majority of what it needs, that needs to be added, would sit nicely
on top of what we already have.
We've got to work out memory management, heaps, type tables, etc - so that
we can make it work with the korlib - and then of course: the JIT,
scheduler, HAL, VFS, (and anything else that the mono corlib depends on that
I can't think of off the top of my head)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
SharpOS-Developers mailing list
SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
