On Feb 3, 2008 10:14 PM, TraumaPony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With regard to:
> "Another miscellaneous food for thought is pointer usage. If you are
> writing code against the architecture, or against memory, that requires the
> representation of a memory address: we need to stop using 'uint' just
> because we are assuming we are working on 32-bit x86. " void* " exists for a
> reason..."
> What about IntPtr?
>
Virtually the same thing - but I'm sure there is a performance overhead for
using it, equivalent to boxing and unboxing. DarxKies would have to clarify
/ correct me on that one though.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
SharpOS-Developers mailing list
SharpOS-Developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sharpos-developers
