|
Paul,
Please make the note shorter if you do copy it.
The moderator probably thinks that this discussion is off topic.
Phonemic Alphabets:
Roman based Historical Non Roman
-------------------- ------------- -----------------
IPA Shavian
Webster Tengwar
i/t/a PMF - PMF uses Shavian shapes but calls them streamlined Roman.
New Spelling
Sound Spel [fonetic]
Truespel [marks stress with dbl letters]
Spanglish [there are a 100 others]
PV: It all depends on you point of view. There are more options than that and it does depend on what you want.
If you want something that can be rapidly written, then Shavian is a good choice.
If you want something that can be rapidly typed or email compatible, then you probably want something else.
Both IPA and Shavian contain special characters that are generally not supported with Web fonts. IPA can be written in Unicode. Shavian will eventually have this option.
As you mentioned earlier, the i/t/a lacks a unique schwa symbol.
There are other similar schemes that do so why wouldn't you consider these instead of the i/t/a?
--Steve
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- [shavian] An answer for Steve's Question stbetta
- [shavian] An answer for Steve's Question paul vandenbrink
