On 06/25/2012 01:31 PM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote:
> It looks better to make write_info
>
> struct write_info {
> struct pollfd pfds;
> struct sd_vnode *vnodes;
> };
>
> and define wi as
>
> struct write_info wi[SD_MAX_REDUNDANCY];
The only benefit I can see is that we can use a single memmove() call to
update write_info. But use three memmove() doesn't do harm and this
structure change will cause a lot of rebasing and we can't add more
structure member as nr_sent to the structure. So I think package all the
write info struf into write_info is okay at least to this initial
version. If any modification is really needed, we can patch it on demand.
Thanks,
Yuan
--
sheepdog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
