At Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:27:38 +0800, Liu Yuan wrote: > > On 06/25/2012 04:01 PM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > > At Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:56:04 +0800, > > Liu Yuan wrote: > >> > >> On 06/25/2012 02:39 PM, MORITA Kazutaka wrote: > >>> Why do you assume the request size is 512k? Maybe I'm missing > >>> something, and I'm fine with it if 8 is not too small. > >> > >> For powerful server which can host dozens of Guests, 8 might be small. > >> But I think we can later modify the code to make max nr configurable. > >> For a server host 4~8 guests, I think 8 is okay. > > > > Okay, agreed. > > > > I have updated the patch to address problems you pointed out. If there > isn't any other problem, I am going to merge it. Kazum?
This is a bit big change. So, IMHO, it's better to wait at least one day so that developers in other timezones can have a chance to review them. Thanks, Kazutaka -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
