On 2012年08月20日 13:09, MORITA Kazutaka wrote:
> At Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:27:37 +0800,
> levin li wrote:
>> @@ -1479,11 +1483,11 @@ out:
>> static struct subcommand vdi_cmd[] = {
>> {"check", "<vdiname>", "saph", "check and repair image's consistency",
>> NULL, SUBCMD_FLAG_NEED_NODELIST|SUBCMD_FLAG_NEED_THIRD_ARG, vdi_check},
>> - {"create", "<vdiname> <size>", "Paph", "create an image",
>> + {"create", "<vdiname> <size>", "Pcaph", "create an image",
>> NULL, SUBCMD_FLAG_NEED_NODELIST|SUBCMD_FLAG_NEED_THIRD_ARG,
>> vdi_create},
>> - {"snapshot", "<vdiname>", "saph", "create a snapshot",
>> + {"snapshot", "<vdiname>", "scaph", "create a snapshot",
>
> 'vdi snapshot' makes existing objects snapshot ones. To support '-c'
> option for the command, we need to modify the redundancy level of the
> already stored objects. Is it what you expect?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kazutaka
>
Well, indeed, we should use the redundancy level of the base VDI
thanks,
levin
--
sheepdog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
