At Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:14:32 +0200, Bastian Scholz wrote: > > Am 2012-10-22 08:43, schrieb MORITA Kazutaka: > > Yes, we need more numbers with various conditions to change the > > design. (I like this patch implementation, which uses the same code > > with ordered work queue, though.) > > > > I think of trying it, but I wish more users would test it too. > > Hi Kazutaka, > > If I want to test it, can I use the thread branch from git?
Yes, thanks! So far, I've not encountered situations where my patch shows worse performance. In most cases, queue_work is called only from one thread, so serializing at queue_work is unlikely to be a problem. Another contention is between queue_work and worker_routine, but worker threads spend the most of time doing disk I/Os and it also couldn't be a problem on my environment. Thanks, Kazutaka -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
