On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:54:02PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > Current "dog vdi check" cannot work well in a case of inode object > lost. This patch lets the subcommand handle the case correctly. > > Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <[email protected]>
Why we need this patch? what did this patch try to fix? If we remove one inode object, current 'vdi check' can fix it without any problem. no? Thanks Yuan -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
