At Wed, 20 Nov 2013 22:04:28 +0800, Liu Yuan wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:54:02PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote: > > Current "dog vdi check" cannot work well in a case of inode object > > lost. This patch lets the subcommand handle the case correctly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hitoshi Mitake <[email protected]> > > Why we need this patch? what did this patch try to fix? If we remove one inode > object, current 'vdi check' can fix it without any problem. no?
Really sorry for my delayed response. I was busy with other work. And sorry for the poor explanation. The patch tried to implement a functionality for handling 'corrupted' inode objects. For doing this, dog must do a majority vote for inode objects. I tried to implement it but I found the patch cannot do it well. I'll send v2 later. Thanks, Hitoshi -- sheepdog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wpkg.org/mailman/listinfo/sheepdog
