I am assuming your wanting this to be a 300hp car you could drive on the street with pump gas. For 300FWHP I think even a super 60 might be to small. You would likely need a T3/T4 hybrid turbo. I ended up going with a hybrid but I wish I had done a Super 60 because of simplicity.
IMO you can just get a cheapo ebay IC and that would cool and flow plenty fine. You can use a gvalve or if you have a custom calibration done you can let the computer keep control of boost. No need for extra injectors. Just get yourself some +20 or +40 injectors and a calibration. Only need for an adj fuel pressure regulator (AFPR) is to fine tune your FP with you injectors and new calibration. If you get the cal right you can keep the stock one. Depending on your budget I would do a true Super 60 turbo, Get a mild port job on your head along with your back cut valves. A ported heat coated exhaust manifold, ported intake manifold, the +40 injectors, calibration, used srt4 IC or equivalent, AFPR... ect That's all I can think of at the moment. I would reconsider dropping the dough on your 86 motor if you have an 89+ motor. They are stronger and better. IMO the 782 head is a better head for a car that's going to see the street more then the track. I would try and keep your CR around 8:1 or even better 8.5:1 --- On Sat, 9/6/08, Edward Mazurek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Edward Mazurek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: SD> Current recipe for 300HP? > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 12:45 PM > Hi, > > I'm ramping up for getting my 86 GLH-T back on the > road. I'd like to > get it to 300HP. What is the current state-of-the-art > recipe for > 300HP? > > Standard T2 turbo or super 60? > Which intercooler? > G valve or computer? > Extra injectors? > Rising rate regulator? > I'd like to run on 93 octane. > > Any and all advice is appreciated. > > I'm currently planning on using a G head with a 3 angle > valve > job. Since it's an 86 engine I understand this will > drop my > compression ratio. This is good and bad. Good for more > boost but > bad for responsiveness. What would a good compression ratio > be > for this? > > I have a 90 VNT engine but I was hoping not to have to use > it > just yet. I have to get this car going! > > Thanks, > > Ed > > ___________REMOVE-FOOTER-WHEN-REPLYING_________ > ShelbyDodge mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.imagilist.com/mailman/listinfo/shelbydodge ___________REMOVE-FOOTER-WHEN-REPLYING_________ ShelbyDodge mailing list [email protected] http://www.imagilist.com/mailman/listinfo/shelbydodge
