On Jan 18, 2008 3:11 PM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I can tell right now, we're probably going to only wind up with 1
> "Hunk" anyway, since the inlining of the other files will wind up happening
> in the cajoling process rather than in shindig itself.
Okay, so we assume then that the only change you are making to the
content is message substitution, and that this does not substantially
affect file positions (i.e., it does not affect *line* number)? If so,
then you're right, we only need 1 hunk.
If so, then the information we need is the start position for the
[one] hunk, right? And we don't need the inline annotations, right? So
we end up with --
GadgetContentRewriter.rewriteContent(
...,
FilePosition start,
Readable content,
...);
Does this look okay then? Does everyone -- Shindig and Caja -- like
this better? What are the limitations?
Ihab
--
Ihab A.B. Awad, Palo Alto, CA
