Just to clarify this because of questions I've gotten from others: I'm saying that Shindig will provide an implementation of the service, not the actual infrastructure for said service. We would hope that existing infrastructure providers such as google would provide that sort of community infrastructure for those that might want it.
~Kevin On Jan 18, 2008 1:14 AM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you so much for this, Ihab (and the entire Caja team). > > We should probably also share our face to face discussion about building a > Cajoling web service for people who aren't able to use the Caja java code > directly. Do you feel that this should be maintained by Caja, or would you > prefer that Shindig manage it? Speaking for the Shindig project, I think > we'd be happy to manage this responsibility, and I will personally write the > initial version of said web service. We should probably produce at least a > semi-formal document outlining what this web service will look like as well. > > > ~Kevin > > On Jan 17, 2008 7:46 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > In an attempt to document the results of a discussion about the > > interface between Shindig and the Cajoler, I modified this document -- > > > > > > http://google-caja.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/html/cajaOpenSocialGadgetRewriting/index.html > > > > and the diffs since the last version are attached fyi. > > > > I'm especially interested in knowing whether I got the format of the > > embedded line number and source file annotations right. All other > > comments are welcome too, of course! Cheers, > > > > Ihab > > > > -- > > Ihab A.B. Awad, Palo Alto, CA > > > >
