I'm going to send this patch around in an incomplete form now (doesn't handle request signing correctly) so that people can review it. I'm leaving off the request signing because of efforts underway to refactor that code anyway.
I'll open up a JIRA issue with the patch. On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I share your concerns as well, having been burned all too often by > > heavyweight "frameworks" that just make writing code more difficult > than it > > needs to be, and I was initially opposed to Guice, but having tried it > first > > hand I feel that it's a very elegant way to solve the problem, and it > looks > > like a variant of the same technique is going to wind up in JSR-299, so > it's > > a pretty sound decision going forward. I'm sure other people who've > worked > > with Guice directly (I believe both John H and Cassie have) will have > more > > insight. Initial impressions from my standpoint are pretty high. > > FWIW, we use Guice on Apache Roller, it's good stuff. it's definitely > elegant and it's > pretty lightweight both from a conceptual point of view and in physical > size. > > - Dave > -- ~Kevin
