On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 6:08 PM, David Primmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hi Cassie, I'm looking out for the API server and was under the
> assumption that it would be an autonomous server. After looking at the
> changes to the source tree recently (moving from the proposed
> /java/social to under /java/gadgets/../social/ it seems that a few
> small things have been done to make the API server more dependent on
> the gadget server. Maybe this is just a matter of expediency and was
> done simply to get a stub checked in to work with. But the concerns of
> the PHP dev here are basically my concerns: Java build and deployment
> decisions affecting the 'standard' way of doing things.
>
> comments below:
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Cassie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My thoughts:
> >
> >  1. We should make the php stuff use the same url structure as the java
> stuff
> >  (making people change configs by hand is evil)
> >  2. The java social/* directory depends on the gadgets/* directory.
>
> Can you explain why this is. This seems wrong to me.
>
> >  3. I don't care what the url is at all, as long as people only have to
> run
> >  one server by default for the java stuff.
>
> There are two servers that have not dependencies on one another and
> they can be mounted at their own urls or on run on different servers.
> I'm a little confused about the need to get a nice 'all in one'
> reference implementation server for all of OpenSocial and how it
> balances against the need to provide an implementation that is
> designed to be deployed in a realistic server environment. The server
> as it is now can be dis-assembled and distributed but seems like this
> dis-assembly could be facilitated be taking some measures to isolate
> the components and add more hooks for application servers.
>
> >
> >  Okay, so all of those mean that we either need to make the
> >  gadgets/socialdata url work for php or we need to make the /socialdata
> url
> >  for for java.
> >
> >  Unfortunately, for the java side things work like this:
> >  - the entire running server is mapped to localhost:8080/gadgets.
> >  - each servlet has a namespace under /gadgets. so the GadgetDataServlet
> >  happens to be mapped to socialdata just like the JsServlet is mapped to
> js
> >  and the RpcServlet is mapped to metadata. so social data is at the same
> >  level as all the other servlets
>
> This doesn't seem necessary. The social data (the API server for
> people, activities and appdata) is not functionally at the same level
> as these other servlets because it is not an interface for the gadget
> server. You don't need to serve gadgets to participate in OpenSocial.


Yes you do. You can't support opensocial without supporting the gadgets spec
as well. They're effectively a single spec, although there's currently a
pedantic separation due to the way that the specs have evolved.


>
> >  - i don't think i can get out from under the gadgets namespace unless
> we a)
> >  get rid of the namespace altogether or b) start up two servers. both of
> >  those don't sound so hot.
>
> I don't see what's wrong with a or b. Where is it specified that all
> servers must start with a /gadgets/ url prefix?
>
> >
> >  On the php side, i didn't quite get why the socialdata servlet can't
> live
> >  under the gadgets namespace (sorry for my naivete!)
> >  Can we just have php/gadgets/index.php handle the socialdata calls?
> Perhaps
> >  it would help if we changed the name from "socialdata" to "gadgetdata".
> Or
> >  just "data"?
>
> I'd hope that people could mix up the runtimes that are serving
> different parts the /gadgets and /social system but the spec will be
> fairly clear so that there are consistent url patterns across the
> servers implemented at different OpenSocial sites.
>
> >
> >  If you look in the social directory it actually doesn't have to be just
> >  social stuff anymore. It can handle any json request to the server for
> data.
> >  In fact, all the state file calls are handled in addition to the
> >  specifically opensocial type of calls. That is why their is now a
> specific
> >  opensocial subdirectory. And, if a different gadget feature needed data
> from
> >  the server then this setup would be reused.
> >
> >  Alright, so, I'm up for anything that works!
> >  Let me know if you understood what I wrote and hopefully we can find an
> >  answer.
> >
> >  Thanks.
> >
> >  - Cassie
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >  > Hey Cassie (I believe your the main author of the social part of
> shindig
> >  > at the moment?),
> >  >
> >  > I'm getting started on adding some social to the PHP part too, and
> while
> >  > looking at the current work and examples i see that it currently uses
> >  > the following url:
> >  > http://<host>/gadgets/socialdata
> >  >
> >  > While you can keep your folders nicely separated in the Java version,
> >  > this is more difficult to do in the PHP version (since this URL would
> >  > imply the social data part should atleast partially reside in the
> >  > gadgets  folder), which creates a dependency and mixing of sources i
> >  > would rather prevent.
> >  >
> >  > Now i could probably bypass this by some .htaccess magic and redirect
> >  > the requests based on the URL to the right PHP source folder, but
> that
> >  > would make it less readable and less intuitive for anyone looking at
> the
> >  > PHP source (you would expect /gadgets/* to go to
> >  > <shindig_root>/php/gadgets/index.php and forinstance /social/* to go
> to
> >  > <shindig_root>/social/index.php).
> >  >
> >  > Now it's my intention to keep the PHP version identical to the Java
> >  > version in every way possible as far as the examples and basic file
> >  > usage goes (features, synd config, urls etc), so this would present a
> >  > bit of a dilemma for me, do i create some (relatively ugly) hacks to
> >  > make it work with the /gadgets/socialdata or do i break away from the
> >  > standard url config and hope that people read the documentation well
> >  > enough to see what they should change to make the PHP version work?
> >  >
> >  > So my hope is we can bypass this by putting the GadgetDataServlet
> under
> >  > a different url (/social/data? or /socialdata/<something> ? or even
> >  > just /social[data] ?), would help me a lot :)
> >  >
> >  >    -- Chris
> >  >
> >
>



-- 
~Kevin

Reply via email to