On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 8:07 PM, John Panzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip> > > All of these benefit from separating the code and URLs of the two > > subsystems. > <snip> > > Can we please not separate the code too much? There's a certain > amount of infrastructure that can be usefully shared between the two > services. > I suspect that the best approach here is going to have a separate sub project for the shared code (under java/shared or perhaps java/social). Both java/gadgets and java/api (or whatever name is appropriate) would consume the various shared pieces here. The other language ports can follow a similar convention using an appropriate structure for their platform. I originally encouraged Cassie to check the code into a setup like that, but she had some reasons that now escape me for not doing it then. I think it had something to do with not wanting to run a separate server.
