This is probably useful, but I'm hesitant on the namespace -- if a standardized "auth" feature emerges, we'd have a conflict. I think this came up before. Perhaps we should make all shindig implementation packages name an underscore suffix to avoid this? Something like gadgets.auth_. We could even put it under the "shindig" namespace to really avoid conflicts (and we could migrate gadgets.config to this as well).
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey folks - > > I'd like to write a javascript library to manage the gadget security > token. Code that calls gadgets.util.getUrlParameters().st would need > to change to call gadgets.auth.getSecurityToken(). > > This will let us do things like periodically update the security token. > > Cheers, > Brian >
