btw - we -do- have jsunit tests. we aren't writing enough of them but they do run.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is probably useful, but I'm hesitant on the namespace -- if a >> standardized "auth" feature emerges, we'd have a conflict. I think this came >> up before. Perhaps we should make all shindig implementation packages name >> an underscore suffix to avoid this? Something like gadgets.auth_. We could >> even put it under the "shindig" namespace to really avoid conflicts (and we >> could migrate gadgets.config to this as well). > > shindig.auth attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-264 > > Cheers, > Brian >
