:D Good point Cassie.
We are finishing all OAuth (0.7) impl today, i'll create a patch for that and add it to a JIRA issue. Ropu On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Cassie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ropu - You should really be creating jira issues with patches for > these commits attached. If you don't post public patches then we will > never see which code you are actually committing... which means we > would never be able to vouch for you as a committer. > > It is great to know that you are contributing though. Thanks for the help! > > - Cassie > > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Ropu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > Im the Teach Lead managing all OpenSocial stuff in Globant, and as Chris > > stated, we are, and will continue to collaborate with Shindig, PHP and > Java. > > Right now we canalize all of our commits though Chris, but we are ready > to > > become committers in the near future. > > > > We do have several big clients that are implementing Shindig PHP as well > as > > the JAVA version. (And i'll hope we'll start contributing JAVA soon too) > > > > So from Globant's side, Shindig has all our support. > > > > Regards > > > > Bruno Rovagnati (Ropu) > > > > www.globant.com > > > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> While having the PHP shindig server by it's self is already a good > factor > >> in this, in the PHP shindig implementation it's self I'm seeing more and > >> more interest from other people and parties too, so even in this front > the > >> diversification is going well. > >> > >> There's explicit stated interest from about 4 large SNS's to use php > >> shindig for their becoming an open social platform, most of which have > >> expressed interest in contributing to shindig (some already are *waves > to > >> people from globant.com*). > >> > >> Plus there's currently 3 social network software writers who plan to > >> release new versions of their products with shindig integrated this > summer, > >> some of which also expressed the desire to contribute. > >> > >> So there is already some actuated contributions happening and quite a > few > >> potentials in the future, so I'm hoping some of these will be become > >> committers too :) > >> > >> All in all, i think we are gathering enough stakeholders on various > fronts > >> that the goal of guaranteeing the projects health in the future, even if > one > >> large party would pull out, is going well; So i share your opinion that > the > >> next ApacheCon could be a realistic goal > >> > >> -- Chris > >> > >> > >> On May 16, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Santiago Gala wrote: > >> > >> I think that, with the alternate php server diversifying the code base > >>> way beyond the original donation, the number of refactorings already > >>> going on and the fact that there is people already in the committer > pool > >>> coming from different stakeholders, not to mention next committers to > be > >>> "invited", the project looks relatively mature for a quick graduation. > >>> Next ApacheCON looks like a realistic horizon, IMO. What do you think? > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > .-. --- .--. ..- > > R o p u > > > -- .-. --- .--. ..- R o p u
