On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for 100, (but not a committer, so not a strongly held view), > however > +1 for consistency to reduce ease of patching. Reduce ease of patching? :) > > > Ian > > 2008/6/10 Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'm in favor of 100. I find that even with 2 char indents that we line > wrap > > more code than I'm used to. That causes readability to suffer. > > > > > > > > On Jun 10, 2008, at 1:22 AM, Kevin Brown wrote: > > > >> Our style guide calls for 80 columns ( > >> > >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/SHINDIGxSITE/java-style.html#JavaStyle-Linewrapping > >> .) > >> > >> Unfortunately, this hasn't been followed very well, so that leaves us > with > >> two options: > >> > >> - Modify all the existing code to 80 columns. > >> - Up the limit to 100 columns (covers existing code, still narrow enough > >> for > >> most terminals). > >> > >> Any strong opinions on this one? > > > > Paul Lindner > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > >
