2008/6/10 Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> +1 for 100, (but not a committer, so not a strongly held view), >> however >> +1 for consistency to reduce ease of patching. > > > Reduce ease of patching? :)
Oops, increase :) Sorry Need caffeine. > > >> >> >> Ian >> >> 2008/6/10 Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > I'm in favor of 100. I find that even with 2 char indents that we line >> wrap >> > more code than I'm used to. That causes readability to suffer. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Jun 10, 2008, at 1:22 AM, Kevin Brown wrote: >> > >> >> Our style guide calls for 80 columns ( >> >> >> >> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/SHINDIGxSITE/java-style.html#JavaStyle-Linewrapping >> >> .) >> >> >> >> Unfortunately, this hasn't been followed very well, so that leaves us >> with >> >> two options: >> >> >> >> - Modify all the existing code to 80 columns. >> >> - Up the limit to 100 columns (covers existing code, still narrow enough >> >> for >> >> most terminals). >> >> >> >> Any strong opinions on this one? >> > >> > Paul Lindner >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >
