Agree by commits@ to dev@ Agree with Henning on the fact that discussions will be split. BTW doing a reply on jira@ is a bad practice in general: issue tracking's goal is to log every issues/comments :) So I will prefer jira@ to dev@ so we could slow down users errors...
Cheers, Vincent 2008/7/1, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I agree with Henning as well -- commits -> shindig-dev, JIRA -> JIRA. > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > >Shindig is a busy project - and for those of us that aren't following > > >the project full time, sifting through commit messages and jira issues > > >can make following the project difficult. > > > > >As some of you will have noticed already, I have set up two new lists, > > >shindig-issues and shindig-commits. I subscribed everyone on shindig-dev > > >to these two new lists. > > > > >I've redirected commit messages and jira notifications to these new > > >lists. > > > > That is IMHO actually a bad idea. As a lot of the discussions happens > > on the JIRA issues, this effectively splits the development list in > > half. One part of the discussions will be on JIRA and shindig-issues > > and the other half on the -dev list. > > > > Commits is fine, though. > > > > >Hopefully this will help newcomers to the project acclimatise more > > >quickly. > > > > Drinking from a large firehose or drinking from three smaller > > firehoses will have the same net effect. :-) > > > > Ciao > > Henning > > > > > > -- > > Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux, > > 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person > > Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | Velocity - Turbine guy > > > > INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB 7350 > > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen > > > > "Professor Peach in the library with the lead piping!" -- Donna > > >
