If only life was that easy.
The party line message we received was "This wiki is for committers
only, and you have to request access first", this due to capacity
problems.
However what i think we -want- from a wiki is what makes wiki's great
in general ... the fact that anyone can edit and add documentation to
it :) (with a proper amount of reviewing & moderation happening where
required ofc".
-- Chris
On Jul 15, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Getting a Wiki is as simple as requesting either a MoinMoin or a
Confluence Wiki from infra. According to
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SHINDIGxSITE/Index
there seems to be a Wiki set up already. :-)
Ciao
Henning
[Cutting down the Cc list a bit]
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 10:46 +0200, Chris Chabot wrote:
What I'm still very hopeful to see is a Wiki system (any flavor will
do) for Shindig.
The lack of documentation and possibilities for people to contribute
too- has really held our adoptation back a bit, and caused many
duplicate threads on the same subjects to happen.
On the other hand i remember infrastructure@ saying that a zone
should
not be used for anything important?
Thoughts?
-- Chris
On Jul 15, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Kevin Brown wrote:
[+shindig-dev, This doesn't belong on shindig-private]
A sample running on ASF infrastructure probably isn't going to
happen.
Continuous integration will, but it's not really reasonable to
expect apache
infrastructure to maintain the kind of secure setup that an
opensocial
container needs, and it'd be far too easy for someone to screw it up
to
subject said infrastructure to those kinds of security risks.
There's really
no strong reason for running a shindig build on apache
infrastructure, and
that wasn't the reason for requesting the zone in the first place.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Dan Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(bcc: infra-private)
Shindig-private, can someone summarize and get this ball moving on
shindig-dev?
It'd be nice to have the sample running on Apache's infrastructure
with
periodic builds.
Thanks,
-Dan
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Joe Schaefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Can we please move this conversation about the domain
name off infra-private now, and put it on shindig-dev
instead?
Thanks.
--- On Thu, 7/10/08, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A zone!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Ben Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, July 10, 2008, 6:12 PM
Why have shindig in the name? This is only used for
rendering
iframes, it never shows up in the URL bar at all.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about shindiggadgets.org ?
On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 14:59 -0700, Brian Eaton wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Henning
Schmiedehausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let's go with
"shindigcontainer.org" or
"apache-shindig.org". Everyone
will know what is meant.
Will they? To me "apache-shindig.org"
means "This is code provided by
the Apache Shindig project". That's not
true at all for gadgets.
I'm still leaning towards amodules.org.
Nothing Apache or Shindig
branded, this is third-party code.
--
Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | JEE,
Linux, Unix
91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 |
Apache Java Software
Open Source Consulting, Development, Design |
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG
Fuerth, HRB 7350
Gesellschaftssitz: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer:
Henning Schmiedehausen
char name_buf[257]; /* max unix filename is
256, right? */
--
Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | JEE, Linux, Unix
91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache Java Software
Open Source Consulting, Development, Design |
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB
7350
Gesellschaftssitz: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning
Schmiedehausen
char name_buf[257]; /* max unix filename is 256, right? */
