What do people think about this proposal?
It would involve modifying the names used in gadget.properties and
@Named annotations.
On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Paul Lindner (JIRA) wrote:
Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties
-------------------------------------------------------------
Key: SHINDIG-481
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-481
Project: Shindig
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Common Components (Java)
Reporter: Paul Lindner
Assignee: Paul Lindner
By overriding DefaultGuiceModule I was able to replace the
properties source with our common properties source.
If this becomes common practice it would be preferable to namespace
the names in gadgets.properties by adding a 'shindig.' prefix.
For example
http.cache.negativeCacheTtl
becomes
shindig.http.cache.negativeCacheTtl=30000
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Paul Lindner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
