+1 from me. On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Kevin Brown wrote: > > It makes sense to me, though since they're strings it'll mean a bit of >> find >> and replace work. If you want to take care of it, though, I don't see any >> big issues with it. >> >> > Thanks, this will help with our integration at hi5 quite a bit. > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Paul Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> What do people think about this proposal? >>> >>> It would involve modifying the names used in gadget.properties and @Named >>> annotations. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jul 30, 2008, at 3:37 AM, Paul Lindner (JIRA) wrote: >>> >>> Use unique shindig namespace for values in gadgets.properties >>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Key: SHINDIG-481 >>>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-481 >>>> Project: Shindig >>>> Issue Type: Improvement >>>> Components: Common Components (Java) >>>> Reporter: Paul Lindner >>>> Assignee: Paul Lindner >>>> >>>> >>>> By overriding DefaultGuiceModule I was able to replace the properties >>>> source with our common properties source. >>>> >>>> If this becomes common practice it would be preferable to namespace the >>>> names in gadgets.properties by adding a 'shindig.' prefix. >>>> >>>> For example >>>> >>>> http.cache.negativeCacheTtl >>>> >>>> becomes >>>> >>>> shindig.http.cache.negativeCacheTtl=30000 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >>>> - >>>> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >>>> >>>> >>>> Paul Lindner >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > Paul Lindner > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >
