On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we put it into a package like gadgets.testing to be explicit then? > It can't go into common.testing of course, but gadgets.testing is probably a > reasonable thing to create.
Its in the gadgets test package already. So far the only place that uses it it is OAuthFetcherTest. If it seems useful somewhere else we can always move it.
