On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Brian Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should we put it into a package like gadgets.testing to be explicit then? > > It can't go into common.testing of course, but gadgets.testing is > probably a > > reasonable thing to create. > > Its in the gadgets test package already. So far the only place that > uses it it is OAuthFetcherTest. If it seems useful somewhere else we > can always move it. Ok, there's my confusion. It's not in a test package, it's just in the test directory, which is a little odd since it isn't a test. Eclipse and intellij complain that it has no test methods now.
