I'd highly recommend using the APR versioning scheme and documenting
what versions of the spec are supported. It works out well enough for
all the servlet containers, anyway :-)

-Brian

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 27 Nov 2008, at 11:36, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
>
>> Ian Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Any comments ?
>>
>> Folks, I might be late to the show (the whole discussion seems to be
>> happening on Nov 20th inside a few hours [1]), but please:
>>
>> This versioning scheme (along the spec) is bad. Shindig will be
>> considered "not ready" by not hitting a 1.x version.
>>
>> By that arguing, the Apache Webserver would be at
>> 1.1-<some-large-number>. What if you want to rearchitect the internal
>> code of Shindig and need to reflect that in a version number?
>> 0.8.1-2.1 ?
>>
>> One of the most frequent questions on the list in the future will be
>> "where is version 0.8.0?", closely followed by "where is version
>> 1.0.0?"
>>
>> You basically tie the version cycle of the software to the version
>> cycle of the spec.
>>
>> Please, use apr versioning (or linux versioning or whatever three
>> digit versioning is considered these days) and start with a sane
>> (e.g. 1.0.0) version.
>>
>>> Happy with the version numbers ?
>>
>> No, not at all. I am -1 on the 0.8.1 naming shebang. Let's see if that
>> count for something here.
>
>
> IMHO, we do need to address this, as Henning points out the conversation
> took place in a few hours, and his opinion should count for something. I
> hope thats not going to be too disruptive.
>
> Its very easy to change the branch and version numbers at this stage, it
> will not be nearly as easy once a release is done.
>
> Ian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>         Ciao
>>           Henning
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Henning P. Schmiedehausen - Palo Alto, California, U.S.A.
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "We're Germans and we use Unix.
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]          That's a combination of two demographic groups
>>                           known to have no sense of humour whatsoever."
>>                              -- Hanno Mueller, de.comp.os.unix.programming
>
>

Reply via email to