Any updates on this ? On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Chris Chabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 509 is an 'bandwidth exceeded' error, which sounds a bit like what it > represents, but not quite :) > > I'm ok with any of the options, but 409 sounds like a decent option to me. > > Anyone have any input on what they think it should be? And lets then make > the error codes the same between implementations :) > > -- Chris > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Astha Bhatnagar < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Shindig Dev, > > > > I have a question regarding to Shindig Error coodes. > > > > According to http://markmail.org/message/ahwnla6mnfkmswxr the Error code > > for > > Limit Exceeded should be 409 as it can be used for both conflict and > limit > > exceeded. But In JsonRPC container js file it is 417 written for checking > > the Limit exceeding error. In Restful container js file there is a place > > holder for the same. In PHP Shindig its 509 for the same. > > > > Accroding to opensocial-and-gadgets-spec discussion it should be 409. But > > by > > the definition 509 it seems to be more correct. However, 509 is not an > > official status code(see > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes). > > My question is what should be the correct code 509 or 409 or or > > 507(suggested in PHP comment) 417:P ? And shouldn't that code be > > homegenously used across all the implementations? > > > > any suggestions or comments ? > > > > should I post this on opensocial-and-gadgets-spec list too as a proposal > ? > > > > Astha > > > -- Ram Sharma
