On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 19:56 +0100, Chris Chabot wrote:
> I think from a practicality point of view, having a tarball per code base
> makes sense, why download N mb when your not going to use it?
> 
> I'm thinking of whipping up a make_release.sh type script that'll create a
> release php-shindig tarball, it could copy in the sample container and
> features code into the php root and save us some of the possible confusion
> (it's happened a few times that people only copied the php dir, forgetting
> they also needed '../features' for instance).

Two tarballs is fine, but remember we vote on tarballs, not svn
revisions. But, if we're releasing both at the same time, we can vote on
both at the same time.

Upayavira


Reply via email to