Thanks for the review.  I'll probably submit later today pending any
other feedback.


http://codereview.appspot.com/13047/diff/1013/1029
File
java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/config/ContainerConfigELResolver.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/13047/diff/1013/1029#newcode36
Line 36: public static final String CURRENT_CONFIG_KEY = "current";
On 2009/02/05 16:49:26, levik wrote:
Templates spec mandates a generic key for referring to the current
data context
to be "Cur" - should probably make this consistent.

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/13047/diff/1013/1026
File
java/common/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/expressions/JsonELResolver.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/13047/diff/1013/1026#newcode117
Line 117: if (property instanceof Number) {
On 2009/02/05 02:11:00, louiscryan wrote:
any need to check for property == null? You use String.valueOf which
insulates
you in other places. Could mess with instanceof check.

Done;  there'll still be NumberFormatException wrapped into an
ELException, but that's much better than a NullPointerException.

http://codereview.appspot.com/13047/diff/1013/1039
File
java/gadgets/src/main/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/GadgetELResolver.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/13047/diff/1013/1039#newcode91
Line 91: return ImmutableMap.of();
On 2009/02/05 02:11:00, louiscryan wrote:
Any reason not to use empty json object?

EL doesn't really care;  and this doesn't allocate anything.  Added a
comment to that effect.

http://codereview.appspot.com/13047/diff/1013/1034
File
java/gadgets/src/test/java/org/apache/shindig/gadgets/process/ProcessorTest.java
(right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/13047/diff/1013/1034#newcode106
Line 106: //    List<Object> aliases =
Arrays.<Object>asList("some-alias", "alias");
On 2009/02/05 02:11:00, louiscryan wrote:
cleanup?

Oops, thanks.

http://codereview.appspot.com/13047/diff/1013/1040
File pom.xml (right):

http://codereview.appspot.com/13047/diff/1013/1040#newcode232
Line 232: </roles>
On 2009/02/05 02:11:00, louiscryan wrote:
separate patch.

Done.

http://codereview.appspot.com/13047

Reply via email to