On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:10 -0600, Shtein, Ilya wrote: > In my honest opinion, Shindig's gadget.rpc doesn't work in complex > scenarios that involve serving content from another security context > (not Shindig's) in the gadget iFrame. Just wanted to let you know... > Please see my post titled "Problems with two-legged OAuth, Single > Sign-on, and gadgets.rpc working together" for details - I attempted > twice to get an answer and failed. > > Yes, we will keep working with Shindig, but the "community voice" is not > that unanimous.
Ilya, This vote is about whether the community is ready to take full responsibility for itself and its code-base - it isn't about whether the code itself is complete, or working, or workable, etc. As to your particular problem, I'm probably one of the least knowledgeable people regarding Shindig on this list, I'm afraid I really can't help - sorry :-( Upayavira
