+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 12:10 -0600, Shtein, Ilya wrote: > > In my honest opinion, Shindig's gadget.rpc doesn't work in complex > > scenarios that involve serving content from another security context > > (not Shindig's) in the gadget iFrame. Just wanted to let you know... > > Please see my post titled "Problems with two-legged OAuth, Single > > Sign-on, and gadgets.rpc working together" for details - I attempted > > twice to get an answer and failed. > > > > Yes, we will keep working with Shindig, but the "community voice" is not > > that unanimous. > > Ilya, > > This vote is about whether the community is ready to take full > responsibility for itself and its code-base - it isn't about whether the > code itself is complete, or working, or workable, etc. > > As to your particular problem, I'm probably one of the least > knowledgeable people regarding Shindig on this list, I'm afraid I really > can't help - sorry :-( > > Upayavira > > -- Ram Sharma
