[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12661627#action_12661627
]
Ian Boston commented on SHINDIG-787:
------------------------------------
>From SHINDIG-764 in the Name object
0.7 was unstructured
0.8 was formatted
0.8.1 is unstructured
see
http://www.opensocial.org/Technical-Resources/opensocial-spec-v081/opensocial-reference#opensocial.Name
The Name object is used by Person in Person.Name
So, IMHO if we are targetting 0.8.1, then the Person object should remain
unchanged an 764 is valid.
------------------
Address
764 did not touch Address, but at the moment in 0.8.1 its unstructured_address
http://www.opensocial.org/Technical-Resources/opensocial-spec-v081/opensocial-reference#opensocial.Address.Field.UNSTRUCTURED_ADDRESS
So that might need to change
> Name field of Person and Address should be "formatted", not "unstructured"
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SHINDIG-787
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-787
> Project: Shindig
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: RESTful API (Java)
> Affects Versions: trunk
> Reporter: Adam Winer
> Priority: Critical
>
> The proper name of the field in the name object for Person and Adress objects
> is "formatted", not "unstructured", as these objects need to match the
> RESTful spec. This is contra SHINDIG-764, which was checked in (incorrectly)
> with SVN revision 723617.
> When fixing this, the doc should also be fixed to reflect that these objects
> must mimic the RESTful spec (not the JS doc, as they incorrectly do).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
