[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12661632#action_12661632
]
Ian Boston commented on SHINDIG-787:
------------------------------------
The restful protocol for 0.8.1 at
http://www.opensocial.org/Technical-Resources/opensocial-spec-v081/restful-protocol
Does not match the opensocial reference at
http://www.opensocial.org/Technical-Resources/opensocial-spec-v081/opensocial-reference#opensocial.Name
(Hence the confusion I guess, sorry if the earlier comments wound anyone up).
Name element has 'formatted' in RESTFull, and 'unstructured' in the reference
Address element has 'formatted' in RESTFull and 'unstructured_address' in
reference.
If the RESTFull spec is the correct spec to follow, 764 needs to be reverted.
The Java OS implementation is an implementation of the wire protocol, the IMHO
Restfull is the correct spec to follow.
> Name field of Person and Address should be "formatted", not "unstructured"
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SHINDIG-787
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-787
> Project: Shindig
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: RESTful API (Java)
> Affects Versions: trunk
> Reporter: Adam Winer
> Priority: Critical
>
> The proper name of the field in the name object for Person and Adress objects
> is "formatted", not "unstructured", as these objects need to match the
> RESTful spec. This is contra SHINDIG-764, which was checked in (incorrectly)
> with SVN revision 723617.
> When fixing this, the doc should also be fixed to reflect that these objects
> must mimic the RESTful spec (not the JS doc, as they incorrectly do).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
