Hi, > change this in the future, or even better, if it is possible > to have distributed passive service checks in some form with what exactly do you mean by that? From the clients' view there is one ip-address where nsca messages are to be sent to. The weak point here is, when Shinken performs an arbiter failover, the nsca-listener gets another address. I have no idea how to handle this except by integrating the arbiter in some cluster framework with a virtual address.
Gerhard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Shinken-devel mailing list Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
