On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Marc-Olivier Barre
<moba...@avencall.com>wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 21:14 +0100, nap wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Gerhard Lausser
> > <gerhard.laus...@consol.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > change this in the future, or even better, if it is possible
> > > to have distributed passive service checks in some form with
> >
> > what exactly do you mean by that? From the clients' view there
> > is one
> > ip-address where nsca messages are to be sent to.
> > The weak point here is, when Shinken performs an arbiter
> > failover, the
> > nsca-listener gets another address. I have no idea how to
> > handle this
> > except by integrating the arbiter in some cluster framework
> > with a virtual
> > address.
> > Yes, the only solution is a VIP between the two receiver or arbiter
> > IP. But it's quite easy to setup, so it's not a big deal :)
>
> A VIP when both machines are on different (geographical) sites ? That is
> at best extremely inconvenient...
>
Hi, hopefully not, you don't have to do this :) (network admins will kill us
:) )
Here the main idea is to have differents receiver in different realms. So
you can have Europe with 2 receivers, and a VIP, and antoher realm named US
with here again 2 receivers, and another VIP.
You can have as many receiver you want, it's just a passive thing after all,
like a buffer of external commands :)
Jean
>
> --
> Marc-Olivier Barre
> Avencall
> 10 bis, rue Lucien Voilin - 92800 Puteaux
> Tél. : 0811 85 9486 (0811 85 XIVO)
> http://www.avencall.com/
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
for your organization - today and in the future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Shinken-devel mailing list
Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
