Hi ! I am wondering if, in the case of a distributed setup with two active schedulers (no spare), if one die the other would take over the first one's checks ? I've done some test about that : - during the first attempt without status retention, the scheduler took over the other checks; - during the second attempt with distributed (mongo) status retention, the second scheduler didn't take over the other checks at first view, and then I had issues with the broker so I cannot see anything anymore :-(
Thanks for your help. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Shinken-devel mailing list Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
