On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Paul Ezvan <p...@ezvan.fr> wrote:
> Le 18/06/2012 14:44, nap a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Paul Ezvan <p...@ezvan.fr> wrote:
> > Jean
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> does the same answer apply to the pollers ?
>
> Thanks !
>
> Paul
>
For pollers it's a bit more simple in fact. There is no limitation with
poller distribution (when with scheduler the arbiter need to cut your
configuration, so you cannot have only ONE big dependency tree). Putting a
poller in spare is not really useful (if you got a server ready to run why
not activate it?), so in an HA architecture, you can have in the "slave"
server all daemons as slave, but not the poller (so you got 2 active
pollers). If one die, the other will have the full load (so you must be
sure than one can manage all the load!) with no impacts.
Spare on pollers can be good for multi-levels realms, but it's another
story :)
Jean
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Shinken-devel mailing list
Shinken-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shinken-devel
